On the Need for Public Punishment
The recent news from Great Britain of systemic gang rape (euphemistically called “grooming gangs”) of underage white British girls by majority Muslim Pakistani men has gone off like a bomb in news outlets and online discussion. The incidents in Telford and Rotherham reported in the past couple of years are indicative of a decades-long problem. Whistleblowers have come forward often (Julie Bindel, Tommy Robinson, Samantha Smith, Douglas Murray, and many others), but their stories were suppressed or ignored, and they were personally targeted for ridicule and attack.
It wasn’t until Elon Musk started posting on X about the gang rape that the story began to gain traction and international attention. While some have complained that Musk jumped on the story in an attempt to distract from the recent H-1B visa and immigrant debate (in which Musk came out worse), one cannot blame him for his indignation and disgust. Once again, the curtain is being pulled back on the ugliness and criminal maladministration of Western governments.
What must be done, and how are we to do it? Ensuring justice, protection, and peace in our nations will be a severe undertaking.
A Compound Problem
The problem with seeking justice for the rape victims and their families is that the authorities who have been tasked with protecting citizens and prosecuting crimes are not merely part of the problem but the instigators and present enablers of the wicked abuse. This is one of the many twisted dimensions of the anarcho-tyrannical regimes currently ruling Great Britain and America. A criminal political elite enables and works in tandem with a criminal underclass; the latter sows anarchy and lawlessness, while the former sows tyranny by protecting the criminal anarchists (often simply by neglect and the failure to prosecute) while simultaneously targeting citizens with spirit and spine enough to resist the assault on their livelihood and civilization.
Both the elites and underclass often commit the same crimes, which allows the ruling ministers and their accessories (e.g., the police) to scapegoat the criminal underclass and so distract from their own heinous evils. This is exactly what happened in Britain. In 2010, five Pakistani men were convicted of sex crimes in Rotherham; the police and authorities hoped this was sufficient to assuage community fears, but many at the time knew that was only the tip of the iceberg—which an explosive 2014 report made clear in its detailed analysis of over 1,400 Rotherham girls who were serially abused sexually. What was meant to be swept under the rug and kept quiet—and so prevent the revelations of the sexual depravity and criminality of Britain’s ruling class—has now been revealed to the world.
Britain and America’s (and Europe’s) ruling class are cut from the same cloth. We cannot point fingers across the pond without realizing that we have the same problem here. Our political class was busy jetting off to Jeffrey Epstein’s island to engage in pedophilic rape and child sex trafficking; congressional staffers videoed themselves in acts of homosexual desecrations in the Senate Hearing Room; illegal immigrants routinely rape and abuse young and innocent American girls who have no way to defend themselves when the southern border is left wide open. America may not be suffering from the exact same systemic gang-rape by minority immigrants as England, but we are afflicted by the same kind of political malaise and gross sexual abuse. We must get our own house in order.
What Justice Requires
Justice requires nothing less than reparation and restraint. Those who commit criminal offenses that harm the life and body, property, or liberty of innocent citizens act in such a way as to threaten the viability of the body politic. Their crimes are not merely individual but public. They must first be restrained; and then punished in a way that is both proportional and merited by their crimes and that also deters other potential criminals.
This is the common-sense and historical view. But fewer believe this than once did. A long-standing love affair with multiculturalism and the disease of pluralism, militant anti-racist ideology (i.e., anti-white racism) taught at our colleges and universities, and a general attitude of safetyism and therapeutic rehabilitation have rendered Americans soft and pusillanimous. We are unable to confront the reality of criminality and the necessity of violence. We have been seduced and our communities devastated by humanitarian ideas of punishment, and we are now ruled by omnipotent moral busybodies that have stripped us of our right and ability to defend ourselves and rule our communities for our own good and prosperity.
Rape is an especially egregious evil. Not only does it inflict physical, emotional, and relational harm to the victim, but it is a violation of the sacredness of human sexuality. The scars it leaves are permanent. In the case of ethnic gang rape in Britain, there are also racial and civilizational components. Many of the young white girls were explicitly targeted because they were English and white; they were racially abused and assaulted as they were raped. The Pakistani immigrant brutes are unabashedly racial supremacists, undoubtedly a natural belief but one enabled and encouraged by Britain’s obsession with multiculturalism and anti-racist ideologies.
More than this, however, is the fact that the targeting and systematic rape of white English girls by foreign minorities over decades can only be interpreted as a collective act of civilizational conquest. The goal of the Muslim and Pakistani men is to subdue, humiliate, physically and emotionally intimidate and crush, and even impregnate the young girls—diluting the English stock in a most vulgar way. This is what victorious armies routinely did to their conquered foes in ancient times, and it is what is permitted in Islam. There is no other way to understand these wicked deeds except as an attempt to conquer and triumph over Western nations out of hatred and revenge over perceived (or real) misdoings and the belief in their own superiority.
Justice requires punishment proportional to these evil crimes, ethnic assault, and national invasion.
On Public Punishment
Both the heinousness and public dimensions of gang rape demand a public response—the strongest response possible by a people and body politic that rightly discerns that they, their children, their homeland, and their way of life is under severe attack and threat.
The only two punishments that are truly appropriate for the most egregious offenders are exile and execution. As Nigel Farage demands, there must be nothing less than a full national inquiry; those who have committed the rape should be tried, sentenced to death, and promptly executed. These trials should be swift, the punishment immediate (no years-long appeals process), and the prosecution exhaustive. Every single man involved in the gang rape should be put to death. Every person—man or woman, family member, police, or political official—who knew this was happening and who did nothing to stop it, or even aided and covered it up, must be brought before the bar of justice.
The Muslim Pakistani families of men who raped English girls should be deported on the spot—no exceptions. Minority immigrant communities that knew of this and did not stop it must be broken up, dispersed, and eventually deported. Remigration must be a top priority for any Reform government in Britain.
Police who knew of the crimes and either suppressed them or who arrested the victims and their fathers instead of the rapists ought to have their police credentials stripped for life and face extended jail time.
Political officials, whether local councilmen or national MPs and government Ministers, must also face the harshest of punishments. In both America and England, the ruling classes are complicit in treason. They have betrayed their own countrymen, whom they have been entrusted with a divine prerogative to protect, and instead have purposely invited foreigners to replace and assault their own people. This cannot be allowed to continue in any form if Western nations want to survive. Public officials who knew of the sexual crimes ought to be arrested and, when found guilty, stripped of their citizenship and exiled. Those engaged in the same sex crimes should be publicly executed.
Machiavelli was right that fear must be a component of any viable political community. While mercy is the more desirable quality for a ruler, only through necessary cruelty (chap. 17) can important political goals be achieved:
A prince, therefore, so as to keep his subjects united and faithful, should not care about the infamy of cruelty, because with very few examples he will be more merciful than those who for the sake of too much mercy allow disorders to continue, from which come killings or robberies; for these customarily hurt a whole community, but the executions that come from the prince hurt one particular person.
The problem in this case, of course, is that our “princes” are goblins, twisted and deformed leaders to whom we cannot look for justice or recompense. Thus, they must be exiled and replaced.
Machiavelli continues:
The prince should nonetheless make himself feared in such a mode that if he does not acquire love, he escapes hatred, because being feared and not being hated can go together very well. This he will always do if he abstains from the property of his citizens and his subjects, and from their women; and if he also needs to proceed against someone’s life, he must do it when there is suitable justification and manifest cause for it. But above all, he must abstain from the property of others, because men forget the death of a father more quickly than the loss of a patrimony.
Western women and the Western patrimony are being assaulted, both by political leaders and minorities. The people must act collectively—without shame in their heritage and without flinching in the face of the infantilizing insults hurled at them—to defend themselves and their way of life against immigrants and elites alike. They must choose a new prince who will do justice through cruelty, for mercy toward the wicked is nothing but injustice toward the innocent.
If the Americans, Anglos, and Europeans cannot muster the appropriate spirit, clear-thinking, and iron stomach to deal with gang rapists and their enablers, then our civilizations will die. We have a choice to make, and we must choose for ourselves and our posterity time and again until these crimes are resolved and our people secure.
Image Credit: Unsplash
How did we get from the coverup of some horrendous atrocities to the charge that have an ‘arnarcho-tyrannical‘ regime? I take it that such a regime was not in place when Trump was President. Is it in place only when the dems are in charge?
But what about America electing a convicted felon? The opponents of Biden could not even produce any court worthy evidence to indict him while Trump was found guilty.
It would seem that the commandment prohibiting the bearing of false witness against one’s neighbor would mitigate what is said against people we Christians politically oppose, but that is not the case here. Rather, a horrible set of stories serves as a backdrop to an unsubstantiated portrayal of the current President. And the question is why.
The article makes it pretty clear how we have such a regime. The criminal class is enabled by the ruling class and allowed to escape real accountability for their evil deeds.
The rest of your post is an irrelevant red herring and whataboutism, as it has nothing to do with the content of the article or its argument.
Of course you would counter something like this. How revealing of your character.
And half of his response is not only irrelevant, but draws a completely inapt comparison between the crimes discussed in the article and Trump’s supposed felonies, as if the charges against Trump were even remotely comparable to violent gang rape. It’s sheer buffoonery.